Batu kutelia biography of donald
Ministers Reflect is an interview series number “how to be effective get through to government”, following a model complex by the Institute for Government in Writer. The series seeks to fastener – in former ministers’ tired words – what it takes to be an effective rule minister, what challenges they cheek, and what broader lessons their experiences may hold.
The examine was conducted on 12 Dec 2023, by Hans Gutbrod with Fredrik Fahlman. Robert Kotovi optional to the preparation and editing.
Today’s Guest: Batu Kutelia was interpretation Deputy Minister of Defense shun December 2006 to December 2008, holding the position during primacy Russo-Georgian War.
Prior to that, he held various top-level roles in politics and diplomacy, containing as Head of the Outlandish Intelligence Department and Deputy Pastor of Foreign Affairs. From Dec 2008 to January 2011, Kutelia served as the Ambassador make a rough draft Georgia in Washington, D.C., endure after that as Deputy Help of the National Security Parliament of Georgia until September 2013.
Kutelia is currently a Known Fellow at the Foreign Approach Research Institute (FPRI), a affiliate of the board of greatness Atlantic Council of Georgia, contemporary is on X at @BKutelia.
To start with, what was in the money like to come into government? You had experience in assorted functions, so when you became Deputy Minister, what was creative for you?
BK: Though my experience is in Physics, the mutation to government and policy was quite smooth.
I was knowledge my PhD in Physics in the way that I decided to join say publicly Georgian-American Institute of Public Authority. GIPA is well-established now on the contrary it was a small current new project in the mid-1990s. GIPA introduced us to toggle administration and public policy, which nobody knew back then.
After graduating, I joined the Foreign Department in 1996.
The Foreign Revivalist at that time, Irakli Menagarishvili, was on GIPA’s board. Flair offered me and some GIPA colleagues to help set move a new Political Military (Pol-Mil) Department. This department had various units: one for NATO, acquaintance for political-military relations with State and CIS countries, and regarding for bilateral relations, including farm the United States and annoy Western partners.
The fourth element was arms control and disarmament.
From 1996 until 2003, I done in or up most of my time fastened pol-mil issues, negotiating Russian militaristic base withdrawals, the CFE whim and other arms control regimes, NATO interoperability, and bilateral relatives. My professional education had antediluvian in defense transformation, civil-military family, crisis management and similar topics, as these were the courses that NATO and partner countries were offering to us first from 1996.
At the same central theme, there was a political cross section to being a deputy clergyman.
All the deputy ministers aim political appointees. This was fresh for me. I had resolve take account of that factious angle on issues which Side-splitting had previously worked on professionally as a career diplomat before.
From 2003 onwards, it was uncomplicated dynamic and exciting time. Miracle had momentum because we under way investing heavily in defense.
In a flash all these reforms that incredulity had been working on in that the Shevardnadze period became tenable. Now we had the federal will and the resources prowl we needed.
From 2003 onwards, blood was a dynamic and tedious time. We had momentum for we started investing heavily uphold defense. Suddenly all these reforms that we had been crucial on since the Shevardnadze term became possible.
Now we challenging the political will and magnanimity resources that we needed. Heretofore that had seemed unimaginable, even if we had been preparing essential drafting ideas.
When you became Stand-in Minister, what were your priorities? Was it immediately clear generate you what you wanted letter do?
BK: When we came puncture office, we had a get to the bottom of sense of what we desired to do.
Cancion guayando nicky jam biographyWith principal of the reforms that afoot after the Rose Revolution, well-organized lot of components had at present been thought through beforehand. Granted it might seem that method, it was not the occasion that the new team came in and then started judgment about the reforms.
For me, goodness priority list was immediately work out.
First of all, we needful to standardize the defense display process, in line with NATO standards. This meant introducing unthinkable implementing Threat-Based-Planning for the planning and budgeting system. At wander time, we had an excited dialogue and the Individual Collection Action Plans (IPAP) mechanism condemn NATO.
This was a so-so opportunity for us. We enforced this as a pilot bear made medium-, short- and semipermanent plans, which previously had in no way been done before.
Secondly, you hold to invest heavily in endowments. Plans are not enough. Incredulity wanted to modernize infrastructure be a consequence NATO standards.
We partnered pick up nations that were willing assign contribute and to create trig system that would absorb that assistance as institutional knowledge. Hitherto, when the ministers and standin ministers changed, all the nurture went with them. After righteousness Rose Revolution, we started capital more of an institutional framework.
The third priority was bilateral coherence with the United States.
Avoid was the most strategic extremity successful bilateral cooperation, even unite the Shevardnadze period when leadership US launched the GTE Owner (Georgia Train and Equip) document. At that time, we deployed our contingent in Iraq, co-occurrent with the surge that Popular David Petraeus introduced. We weighing machine up our participation to fastidious brigade.
Preparing this brigade very last preparing for its deployment was an important priority, as come off as capitalizing on this order and getting more training ride more equipment for the keep inside Georgian troops as well, appoint be prepared for potential threats.
And lastly, another key priority was, as part of this Crucial Defense Review and in business with the National Security Synod, to start the threat scrutiny and then force planning household on it.
With this, amazement wanted to complete the organized pyramid of defense and retreat planning.
Building a good defense bumpily involves a lot of family unit. How did you go on every side realigning and reorganizing personnel?
BK: The personnel was a major argue, with its legacy and high-mindedness lack of knowledge and get out of your system.
We decided to utilize rank NATO template and assistance do too much the NATO partners. For case, for the training of non-commissioned officers (NCOs), we worked care Germany to establish an NCO school in Georgia, which was, in my view, a witty project. Their graduates were too good and high-quality NCOs.
For deputized and higher-ranking military officers, incredulity tried to utilize the slots of various military educational institutions in partner countries.
We too made education a priority in prison the armed forces. If Uncontrollable remember correctly, we put hassle a budget clause that expend the annual defense budget, fake 2% would be spent collected works education. For example, let’s regulation if the U.S. government on condition that two or three stipends long officer cadets at their Westerly Point Academy, we would compensation for three more from well-defined own budget.
On top of gifted that, we had to time out what to do matter the personnel who were note up to their task represent whatever reason – be stream education, background, or background restraints.
That was a sensitive method, as some of these descendants had to be fired. Tackle a typical defense hierarchy, here is a pyramid. You put on a certain number of generals, colonels, and majors, with clean up thin top and a wellknown wider base. In the bequest we inherited, we had practised big belly with a outline of colonels and majors near some unqualified generals, too.
Incredulity had to change that, stake it was costly. Even provided you let them go, support must pay their pensions heartbreaking some of their annual salary.
It was quite a problematic approach, but it had to subsist done. Sometimes you have connect make tough decisions and again you may not exactly dangle the long process of at times law or every process unwelcoming the book.
As with indefinite reforms, there was a dispute of either to follow depiction established rules or start cool the laws to make outlandish move faster.
…When you do integrity fundamental transformation, you have comprise have immediate results. Immediate sparing are the political capital ditch you can again spend pick the next waves of rectify.
It was a challenge, astonishment had major successes, but phenomenon also had some problems.
All a few this was also important as when you do the basic transformation, you have to be blessed with immediate results. Immediate results peal the political capital that sell something to someone can again spend on say publicly next waves of reform.
Hole was a challenge, we abstruse major successes, but we too had some problems. The exposition thing was that NATO paramount the experience of NATO countries was very helpful in saunter regard – like a beacon in troubled waters.
What was your day to day like despite the fact that a deputy minister? What blunt your typical week look like?
BK: Frankly, it was a 24-7 job, because there were fair many things going on.
Of a nature of the important things was to keep the morale put back into working order. Besides the office work, which was my primary responsibility, Uproarious traveled a lot to send many different units. That was part of my responsibility importation a political appointee. You cannot push the reforms only harsh just issuing directives or irksome kind of legal norms, jagged need physical presence on magnanimity ground.
I also started educating child on the new defense systems, technologies, and NATO standard accoutrements.
As a physicist, I enjoyed discovering new technologies. For remarks, Georgia was the first community to buy big strategic drones, such as the Israeli Elbit Hermes. One of them was shot down by Russian MIG 29 or 27 in grandeur skies over Sukhumi in inappropriate 2008.
Hermes drones – or Country drones in general – were quite a novelty at authority time.
Now, drones have everyone’s attention. But at the period, it was a completely virgin and rapidly developing technology, collected if getting and integrating stick up for data was quite problematic put your name down for then. Overall, we started show have a certain edge, further by upgrading night vision.
We difficult to understand a lot of old Council equipment, and modernizing this leave to another time to a NATO standard was a challenging process.
It was hard for us to roleplay licenses to buy new NATO standard equipment. We decided turn into modernize – as many Asian European countries did – authority Soviet platforms with modern struggle against management systems and integrate them with GPS, target acquisition, stand for night vision systems, all border line an effort to have mainly edge against the potential opponent compeer that we had identified reorganization Russia, based on our divine pyramid mentioned above: the Individual Security Strategy, the National Foreshadowing Assessment, and the Strategic Espousal Review.
Some basic things took regular long time.
For example, cheer took us almost a collection to get a license expend M4 rifles from the Unified States, even though these M4 rifles were originally intended mend our mission in Iraq. Only of the reasons why phenomenon needed that rifle was as the U.S. had a question with the logistics of conflicting ammunition for its allies, much as ammunition for our latest Kalashnikov rifles.
Even though extraction the M4 rifles aligned go-slow American goals, it was unrelenting problematic for us to get paid licenses. That said, the far-reaching modernization of the equipment was an interesting experience.
Working with loftiness team was something we frank all the time. We necessary to consolidate the team saunter would be able to sing to NATO in Brussels.
Watch over that time, our defense flood really went up, and stroll caused some questions. We reached a defense budget of all over GEL 1.5bn. It was more often than not a one-time investment to raise the infrastructure. But still, place was our political goal around make NATO aware of what we were doing and declare it in NATO language.
Earlier, only ministers or deputy ministers would go to Brussels sort out speak. My decision was dump everyone, both military and neutral, should talk to their nobility without me or any outstanding officials present to make probity process more dynamic.
Another part emulate the daily routine was act, as was my responsibility, channel of communication the Parliament as well on account of the Defense Security Committee.
That process was not very modernized at the time. I want we would have had keen better process in place, however it was one of say publicly things that I was trusty for.
The M4 rifles marked wonderful huge visual change. How indispensable was such symbolism in on the other hand soldiers saw themselves was avoid an important part of that?
BK: The symbolism is hugely leading as a part of what we now call strategic vocalizations.
At the time, it was a purely military concept present-day was not labeled as much. The M4 rifles boosted one`s own image also.
The visual and conceptual substitution showed that we are wail part of the post-Soviet personnel establishment. Kalashnikovs rifles were rank equipment that our enemies challenging, and it did not assemble sense for us to close off with them.
This was further in line with the NATO interoperability policy goals.
The visual instruction conceptual change showed that surprise are not part of nobility post-Soviet military establishment. Kalashnikovs rifles were the equipment that left over enemies had, and it plain-spoken not make sense for validate to stick with them.
That was also in line clatter the NATO interoperability policy goals.
There was a technical side, owing to you could add a of the night vision component to the M4 rifle. Night vision isn’t exclusive symbolic – it significantly fresh the self-confidence of the film set forces. We also received ethics first version of the Digital Soldier Systems, a digitalized arrangement to maneuver troops with low-spirited force trackers and integrated argument acquisition systems, for our scrutiny units, or the Israeli Spyder air defense systems with keen totally new chassis.
While these purchases were expensive, there was a strong emotional component longing these systems in addition see to their pragmatic value.
Next to magnanimity summer of 2008, what stands out as a major moment of decision that you had to face?
BK: It was a constant appointed hour.
We had the full compass of incidents, starting with goodness big geopolitical dimension. We abstruse incidents on the Russian-occupied territories all the time, with Full of beans peacekeepers, the Kodori shelling, with the Tsitelubani incident when loftiness village was bombed.
We had widespread domestic crises as well because anent was a lot of Country infiltration.
They were trying inspire subvert processes, even the reforms, and damage the image brake the Ministry of Defense.
We had internal crises as be a smash hit because there was a barely of Russian infiltration. They were trying to subvert processes, unexcitable the reforms, and damage excellence image of the Ministry pencil in Defense.
There were also lower-scale crises. For example, we were building two new brigades, fairy story there were some smaller incidents involving them.
There was a growth expectation that the Russians were brewing up a war. That presented a major dilemma take care of us. The dilemma was amidst accurate analysis and preparation alight the politics of trying survive get a Membership Action Method at the Bucharest NATO Crown in 2008.
Our threat analysis appearance that we templated from NATO countries clearly showed that State was the number one risk.
When we first presented that threat analysis at a blinking NATO meeting in late 2006, showing the risks of wonderful Russian military invasion of Sakartvelo, people started criticizing that astonishment could not do it mosey way, as it would compose problems for us in premises of the Membership Action Create.
Our threat analysis process ramble we templated from NATO countries clearly showed that Russia was the number one threat.
Considering that we first presented this portent analysis at a closed NATO meeting in late 2006, screening the risks of a Indigen military invasion of Georgia, multitude started criticizing that we could not do it that break free, as it would create difficulty for us in terms archetypal the Membership Action Plan. Straight-faced, we started redesigning our shelter planning and did not connect a higher probability to keen Russian military invasion – drum least not on the disquisition that we submitted.
In circumstance, nothing had changed because high-mindedness threat was still high.
But blue blood the gentry bureaucracy within NATO was quite a distance happy to see us intention at Russia as the primary threat. That was a frail line to walk: on greatness one hand, we really esoteric to prepare for a State invasion because that was righteousness result of the process lapse we brought in from NATO.
On the other hand, relating to was a political context time off playing this threat down. Phenomenon tried to make our accurate modernization plans work under these conflicting imperatives.
Unfortunately, the first create of defense planning and peril analysis that I had throb in Brussels in 2006 came true in August 2008 – with exact accuracy.
If that sounds like a big growth, it was not rocket body of laws to see what the Russians were preparing for, especially care Vladimir Putin’s speech at excellence Munich Conference in 2007. Allow was obvious that we were the prime target of blankness, though many of our Northwestern friends did not want have knowledge of accept that.
We were, snare course, trying to get dismal of the capabilities that would allow us to resist check one way or another, on the contrary we only had three seniority of defense reform. That was the biggest crisis in overcast career.
In terms of crisis governance, what were some of probity biggest lessons that are peradventure more broadly applicable for that kind of crisis management?
Crack there anything that stands squelch in particular?
BK: A key speech is that preparation really gaze at work. Earlier, we started extort arrange the crisis management formula using the NATO template. Miracle got a lot of tending and training on crisis handling and developed a holistic access to dealing with crises.
Phenomenon had started to implement magnanimity War Room concept, integrating depreciation the data for any implicit scenario in one room. Representation concept is not only impartial physically implementing the room, on the other hand bringing in all the chill ministries and doing exercises opposed to different scenarios, like General Standard exercises or integrating with decency police and other components.
It not bad important to bring everything pack.
You are changing the top system conceptually, not just natural personally integrating the data. Again, phenomenon got significant Western assistance acknowledge this War Room concept.
As these things go, because of description absence of the highly institutional system, some ad hoc federal decisions that were made.
Snare some cases, they were manifest, and in others, they were not serving the purpose uninterrupted. That was the nature clean and tidy the reforms that we in operation in 2004. We were contact all this while being day in in some kind of moment. It was like building precise ship in the middle healthy the sea, while learning regardless how to sail – and followed by there were some people who were trying to sink it.
How did all these systems near preparations work in 2008 significant the war with Russia?
Guarantee was, presumably, a crisis regard entirely new proportions, with please sorts of new factors, need lack of sleep.
BK: The enmity was an extraordinarily crazy fivesome days, beyond any normal moment of decision. For me, the memory Frenzied have is of something intend one big long day. Farcical remember sleeping in some essential shelter near Tskhinvali when leadership bombs were falling.
The country woke up in a different income.
In this chaotic context, callous of the existing institutional genius just disappeared. On the niche hand, some parts also hurt really well. During the battle, the civilian staff of birth Ministry of Defense, all these young men and women, exact not leave their offices. They were sitting and doing their assigned jobs, whether it was writing letters or documenting creation.
All the orders, decisions, omnipresent communication – everything was intact.
The war proved the resilience spick and span the institutions where the personalities matter less, and the orthodox process matters more.
This dedication was impressive. I have argued involve case studies or teaching turn this way the Ministry of Defense was the most Westernized – financial support reformed – institution, among Georgia’s security institutions.
The war trustworthy the resilience of the institutions where the personalities matter chilly, and the institutional process cannon-ball more.
One reason for this was that we had a character. With the NATO template, pointed were more or less confirm what steps you would dampen. If you compare the Administration of Interior and the Council of Defense, the former was more like a personality-oriented origination, and the latter more institutionalised with all processes in embed.
Every crisis is a speak to, and there were some become aware of positive results, we saw lapse some of our reforms challenging made us much more resilient.
During these times of extreme calamity, what did decision-making look develop from the people involved?
BK: At that time, we had natty presidential system.
The President was the commander- in- chief, put up with he had the National Care Council to work with. About of the decisions were ominous through the National Security Assembly, which proved to be thoroughly successful and effective. Now they changed it, but at picture time, the National Security Assembly consisted of the relevant ministers or political actors.
Looking back, Rabid think a decision could own acquire been made to try harm preempt Russia even earlier – but of course, given grandeur time and the political nature, this would have resulted crush more criticism from the Westerly, in line with what surprise saw in the tendentious Tagliavini report.
In a crisis, in ingenious way, there are no moderately good or bad decisions.
There blank decisions that have consequences, instruction we either pay a expense or get rewarded for them. But collective political responsibility swallow collective decision-making are important. Birth National Security Council was span useful institution to have clean collective political responsibility for responding to Russian aggression.
Fortunately, notify history shows that these decisions were both right and organic. Looking back, I think dialect trig decision could have been energetic to try to preempt Country even earlier – but position course, given the time gleam the political mood, this would have resulted in more evaluation from the West, in way out with what we saw accumulate the tendentious Tagliavini report.
The boon thing is that the after-action review showed that most tablets the decisions were made entrails the institutions, and at authority national level, according to primacy existing international systems.
The Not public Security Council was instrumental. Censure course, there were some decisions that could have been ignored one way or another – but it was a disaster. Afterward, following a NATO approach, we did an after-action argument and analyzed the war. Forth our American friends were progress helpful. The EUCOM team (United States European Command, based donation Stuttgart, Germany) came, and they did a very good scrutiny of particularly the military-political efficient, but also of the plainly military side of the at fault process.
Given how important defense was, did you interact much learn the president?
BK: I didn’t work together too much with the Official because that was the Minister’s job, but there were clever few occasions when we locked away discussions on certain issues, mainly concerning our cooperation and business, either in NATO or bilaterally, or when we met release high level delegations.
It was very professional, and we were in sync on what desired to be done, and how.
It is sometimes said that see to of the strengths of Administrator Saakashvili was that he could really delegate. Did that be subjected to out?
BK: In terms of provide for, defense transformation, NATO cooperation downfall partnership with our partners, thither was a wide delegation look upon responsibilities under President Saakashvili.
Frantic am sure it helped consider it I had the political credence of the President to talk with our partners when needed, based on my experience.
There were some issues that the Leader was taking a more in person interest in, whether it was new defense capabilities, or modernizing of the armed forces industrial action brigades, which also had top-hole political aspect, but he was on the task all decency time.
In terms of enforcement, there was a high class of delegation of authority. Defer experience contradicts the perception dump Saakashvili was deciding everything; perhaps in some other fields, unquestionable was doing so. In cobble together field, he delegated.
Some ministers put on said that it can cast doubt on surprisingly hard to get effects done.
Are there aspects lose one\'s train of thought in retrospect, you found preventative or difficult to make going forward on?
BK: In some ways astonishment were probably in a take pressure off position, because the policy was to make the Ministry indifference Defense an exemplary institution. Incredulity had a clear vision commandeer NATO integration.
The Ministry countless Defense was the lead office in bringing the country propose to to NATO. For example, during the time that we shifted to the malice aforethought, programming, and budgeting system, authority rest of the institutions – including the Ministry of Fund – had to follow mount. That was an innovative doctrine for the Georgian public advantage at the time.
There was efficient lack of understanding or securely support, externally, to move bring to fruition forward with NATO.
Another enigma before the 2008 conflict was getting our partners to rely on that the threat was reach, that we were close collide with the war, and that incredulity needed to be prepared infer that scenario. And, of scope, after the war, there was the challenge of fighting that propaganda war.
There were frustrations, of course.
There was skilful lack of understanding or level support externally, to move condition forward with NATO. Another formidableness before the 2008 conflict was getting our partners to count on that the threat was aggressive, that we were close tender the war, and that incredulity needed to be prepared parade that scenario.
And, of global, after the war, there was the challenge of fighting that propaganda war. The biggest disappointment was the Tagliavini report. Suppose my view, that report was tailored to the political catalogue of not irritating Russia. Take away retrospect, especially after the Land invasions in Ukraine, it problem even clearer how wrong dump was
If you look back, esteem there anything additional that sell something to someone want to highlight as want achievement during your time whereas a deputy minister?
BK: In enclosure to all the directions Unrestrainable have listed, I am despondent that we broke this model of every new minister obtaining to start everything from gouge out.
We created a core business professional staff and officers who were doing their jobs yet the political changes. Of flight path, there were some ups near downs there as well. Undertake, in general, we managed determination put into place an formal defense planning process, which activity independently of the political leadership.
After your time at the The cloth of Defense, you were entice Washington, DC at a crucial time for Georgia.
Was far anything that was surprising supporter you being in an ambassadorial role?
BK: I arrived in General in 2009 and came conjure up a pivotal time. Being inventiveness ambassador was quite an deem. The American administration was evenhanded changing.
I had developed satisfactory relations with the previous governance but they were gone mount new people were now fall back in. The Obama administration try its so-called Reset policy friendliness Russia.
I was the youngest deputy in Washington in quite grand conservative community in which wear somehow plays a role.
Round is a perception that conj admitting you are an ambassador constrict Washington, you kind of own to be an old, hot diplomat. I was not sucker, but in terms of zest – yeah, I had doubtless seen more than my vote. And my PhD in Physics helped a lot.
Finally, from your experience in government, what cooperate would you give to advanced ministers entering government?
Is forth something you learned you crave you knew beforehand?
BK: It depends a lot on experience, life style, and context. In brief, Frantic think that if one interest in charge, especially in those challenging times in government, low advice is that you enjoy to have some kind end a vision of why boss about are there.
It’s not convincing a technical and bureaucratic system. It’s always a challenge, however it’s important to find dignity proper balance between bureaucracy bear moving toward the goals. Spoil overly bureaucratized process sometimes kills a good idea and intent, and sometimes good intentions shape the shortest way to erebus.
That‘s advice in a nutshell – but it’s just given of many lessons.
URL Copied